Rss

  • youtube

Education in America – Part I – America’s Original Common Core Curriculum

There has been considerable discussion in the press and halls of education with regard to The Common Core Curriculum Standards Initiative, an attempt by the educational establishment to standardize and strengthen educational standards and expectations at the elementary and secondary levels. Quoting from the Initiative’s English language arts standards, “As a natural outgrowth of meeting the charge to define college and career readiness, the Standards also lay out a vision of what it means to be a literate person in the twenty-first century.” In developing core curriculum standards, it would be worthwhile for the curriculum designers to spend some time reviewing what it meant to be a literate person in America from the arrival of the Pilgrims in 1620 to the beginning of the twentieth century. A few excerpts from such a review will reveal the heart of America’s Original Common Core Curriculum and its role in the creation of the greatest country in the history of the world.

• Harvard University was founded in 1636 under the following Rules and Precepts: “Let every student be plainly instructed, and earnestly pressed to consider well, the main end of his life and studies, is to know God and Jesus Christ which is eternal life (John 17:3) and therefore lay Christ at the bottom, as the only foundation of all sound knowledge and learning.” [Josiah Quincy, LL.D., History of Harvard University, (Boston, MA: Crosby, Nichols, Lee, & Co., 1860), p. 515.]

• The New England Primer first published about 1690 was the only elementary textbook in America for a half century, retained its central role in primary education until 1800 and continued as a principal beginning textbook throughout the 19th century. The eighty-page Puritan primer contained lessons in the alphabet, spelling, short religious instruction, commands to piety and faith, and Bible questions. [Reprint of 1777 edition of The New England Primer by David Barton, (Aledo, Texas: Wallbuidler Press, May 2007).]

• Gouverneur Morris was a signor of the U.S. Constitution. Having been credited as the author of the preamble and having written large sections of the document, he was called the Penman of the Constitution. Morris was a gifted scholar and held a Master’s degree from King’s College (now Columbia College of Columbia University). Morris’s views of education reflected those of his fellow Founding Fathers when he wrote, “Religion is the only solid basis of good morals; therefore education should teach the precepts of religion, and the duties of man towards God.” [Jared Sparks, The life of Gouverneur Morris, Vol. III. (Boston, MA: Gray and Bowen, Vol. III), p. 483.]

• Thomas Jefferson called Samuel Adams “…truly the man of the Revolution…for depth of purpose, zeal, and sagacity, no man in Congress exceeded, if any equaled, Sam Adams.” Samuel Adams was noted for his piety (professed and real) and had deep religious convictions. His views on education paralleled those of many other Founding Fathers. “Let divines and philosophers, statesmen and patriots, unite their endeavors to renovate the age, by impressing the minds of men with the importance of educating their little boys and girls, of inculcating in the minds of youth the fear and love of the Deity…in short of leading them to the study and practice of exalted virtues of the Christian System, which will happily tend to subdue the turbulent passions of Men…” [Samuel Adams, “Letter of Samuel Adams to John Adams, October 4, 1790,” Writings of Samuel Adams, Ed. Harry A. Cushing, (New York: Octagon Books, Inc., 1968), p. 4:343; Ira Stoll, Samuel Adams – A Life, (New York: Free Press, 2008), pp. 9-10, 240.]

• Thomas Jefferson designed of the first plan of education for the District of Columbia which used the Bible and a hymnal as its principal texts for teaching reading to students. [Newt Gingrich, Rediscovering God in America, (Nashville, Tennessee, Discovery House, 2006, p. 46.]

• Noah Webster was a descendent of William Bradford of Plymouth Plantation. His 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language was produced when the American home, church, and school were established upon a biblical and a patriotic basis. The biblical worldview of Webster’s dictionary produced during the first half of the 19th century stands as a testament to the continuing power and force of the Second Great Awakening. Webster held a belief in the importance of intertwining the Christian religion with a free government. “In my view, the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children, under a free government, ought to be instructed…No truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.” [Noah Webster, American Dictionary of the English Language 1828, Facsimile Edition, (San Francisco, California: Foundation for American Christian Education, 1967, 1995 by Rosalie J. Slater), p. 12.]

• Between 1836 and 1920, 120 million copies of the McGuffey’s Reader textbooks were sold. The Readers hailed American exceptionalism, manifest destiny, and America as God’s country although in more secularized terms beginning with the 1879 version. In a 1927 Saturday Evening Post article titled “That Guy McGuffey,” Hugh Fullerton wrote that, “For seventy-five years his (McGuffey’s) system and his books guided the minds of four-fifths of the school children of the nation in their taste for literature, in their morality, in their social development and next to the Bible in their religion.” [John H. Westerhoff III, McGuffey and His Readers, (Milford, Michigan: Mott Media, 1982), pp. 14-15.]

• As the nineteenth century neared its end, there was an extraordinary and dramatic struggle by the forces of humanistic progressive education to wrest power from conservative Protestantism in American education. The National Education Association responded to this struggle with a statement of protest in 1892: “…if the study of the Bible is to be excluded from all state schools; if the inculcation of the principles of Christianity is to have no place in the daily program; if the worship of God is to form no part of the general exercise of those public elementary schools; then the good of the state would be better served by restoring all schools to church control.” [Kansas Historical Society, Columbian History of Education in Kansas, (Topeka, Kansas: Hamilton Printing Company, 1893), p. 82.

This cursory review of American education between 1620 and 1900 conclusively illustrates that the Bible (along with supporting books with a biblical worldview such as The New England Primer and McGuffey’s Reader) was the central text and provided the standards for the original common core curriculum in educating American children. But the influence of the Bible in education was merely a derivative of the pervasive biblical worldview that permeated every facet of American life including the law, politics, trade and business dealings, science, social relationships, and culture in general. So complete was this domination at the time of the American Revolution that 95% or more of the population held the biblical worldview, whether a professing Christian or not. So it is not surprising that the Bible and other books reflecting a biblical worldview were the standards for the original common core curriculum and formed the foundation of American education. In Part II, an examination will be made of the destruction of the original biblically-based common core curriculum in American education by substitution of the humanistic progressive education philosophies of John Dewey and others.

Larry G. Johnson

Sources:

“English Language Arts Standards,” Common Core State Standards Initiative, http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy (accessed June 25, 2013).

American Exceptionalism – Part III – R.I.P. or Revival?

John Adams said, “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion…Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” In other words, the America of the Founders was based upon the assumption that people who accept the biblical worldview are capable of governing themselves internally where ethical and moral issues are concerned. Thus, the architects of America’s early government structure envisioned the Republic supported by a foundation of common morality, and that morality rested on the bedrock of the Christian faith.

As we noted in Part II, Christianity and Christian principles that permeated and bonded with the principles of civil government formed the basis for America’s exceptionalism. Recognition of the truth of Adam’s words that our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people has monumental implications for America in the 21st century as Christianity and Christian principles are being driven from the public square. If America rejects Christianity and Christian principles in guiding and informing American civil government and culture, we will cease to be great and America will no longer be exceptional. As a consequence we will lose our freedoms.

Daily we are seeing the loss of freedom in America. As citizens turn from a Christian worldview, they are unable to guide themselves internally with regard to ethical and moral issues. Benjamin Franklin recognized the folly of this course when he said, “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.” This is a picture of America in the 21st century as we see the power and reach of the state expanding rapidly before our eyes.

The Bible outlines the course of events for nations and points to ancient Israel as the prime example. The cycle begins with a nation being blessed by God. From blessing comes satisfaction which begets pride, but as pride increases people forget God. God brings judgment so that they may remember, repent, and return to God. Without remembrance, repentance, and return, destruction follows. Today, the institutions of American life, its leaders, and a large percentage of the population have mostly forgotten God and deny the validity of the nation’s biblically-based Christian roots in the governance of America and its various institutions. And, the sad fact is that people are ignorant, apathetic, uncaring, or just too busy with life to make a difference.

Much of American society in the 21st century cannot be called by His name for we are chiseling that name from our public buildings and monuments and silencing His mention in public discourse. Humility is no longer an American trait for God has been pronounced dead, and man is now the measure. Prayer is not only lacking but banned from our schools and the public square. The ways of the wicked are embraced wholeheartedly by a popular culture in which deference to maximum autonomy of the individual and abdication of the will to the senses reign supreme.

America’s founding makes sense only when understood as the work of Christians who operated on the basis of a biblical worldview. Just as America was founded by believers, so it must be sustained by believers if it is to survive—believers who care deeply and passionately about their country. We must face the fact that the America as designed by the Founders is likely to disappear altogether if we do not take swift, deliberate, and resolute steps to salvage it.

American exceptionalism is not dead, but it may be on life support. The prescription for reversing America’s cultural decline is a spiritual renewal within the individual which can subsequently transform a nation. Only then can America’s central cultural vision be restored. Spiritual renewals have restored America during several times of crisis in the nation’s history. How do such revivals come? Throughout all of history, the remarkable and unfailing thread running through all of Western civilization’s spiritual awakenings is concerted prayer. That prescription is found in 2 Chronicles 7:14: “If my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land.”

Larry G. Johnson

Sources:

William J. Federer, America’s God and Country, (Coppell, Texas: Fame Publishing, Inc., 1996), pp. 10-11, 247.

Larry G. Johnson, Ye shall be as gods – Humanism and Christianity – The Battle for Supremacy in the American Cultural Vision, (Owasso, Oklahoma: Anvil House Publishers, 2011), pp. 414-416.

American Exceptionalism – Part II – The Essential Ingredient of America’s Greatness

In Part I we looked at the origins and spread of the concept of American exceptionalism as well as the claims of its deniers and detractors. In Part II we will discuss the one essential ingredient that led to America’s exceptionalism and why exceptionalism’s deniers and detractors are so adverse to any consideration of its reality in the history of the nation.

To be exceptional is a condition of being different from the norm; also: a theory expounding the exceptionalism especially of a nation or region. In their book titled Understanding America – The Anatomy of an Exceptional Nation, James Q. Wilson and Peter H. Schuck assembled a collection of essays which examined Alexis de Tocqueville’s declaration that America was “exceptional.” In their summation, the authors wholeheartedly agree with Tocqueville’s assessment and strongly refute the popular assertion, especially in Europe, that although the United States is the sole global superpower, America is no longer any more distinctive that other democratic societies.

Schuck identified seven overarching themes that connect the essays that point to America’s exceptionalism.

• American culture is different than all other nations due to its patriotism, individualism, religiosity, and spirit of enterprise.
• The American Constitution is unique due to its emphasis on individual rights, decentralization, and suspicion of government authority.
• Although generating greater inequality, the American economy has produced a high standard of living due to its competitiveness, flexibility, and decentralization.
• America has had a diverse population throughout its history. In spite of booms or busts, people all over the world want to come to America.
• A strong civil society has made America qualitatively different. This is evidence by the large share of responsibility for social policy borne by the nonprofit sector.
• America has historically relied on certain entities and institutions to provide benefits and minimize dependence on being a welfare-state.
• America has been exceptional demographically due to its population’s relatively high fertility rate.

As we read through this list, we begin to realize that none of the elements are exclusive to America and its founding but are found in varying degrees in other democratic societies. Also, there is no hint as to a special combination or mixture of these elements that made America exceptional. Wilson and Schuck’s book does a commendable job of analyzing the possible sources of America’s exceptionalism, but we still do not have a definitive answer as to that one ingredient that allowed America to become the greatest and most unique nation in the history of the world. Perhaps we can find a clue in the words of two of the nation’s Founders.

“The highest glory of the American Revolution was this; it connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity…From the day of the Declaration…they (the American people), were bound by the laws of God, which they all, and by the laws of their Gospel, which they nearly all, acknowledge as the rules of conduct.” John Quincy Adams (Sixth President of the United States). [William J. Federer, America’s God and Country, (Coppell, Texas: Fame Publishing, Inc., 1996), p. 18.]“

“To the kindly influence of Christianity we owe that degree of civil freedom, and political and social happiness, which mankind now enjoys… Whenever the pillars of Christianity shall be overthrown, our present republican forms of government—and all blessings which flow from them—must fall with them.” John Jay (Co-Author of the Federalist Papers; First Chief-Justice of the US Supreme Court). [“In God We Trust”, Tulsa World, July 4, 2012, A 17.]

From these words we see the influence of Christianity and Christian principles that permeate and bond with the principles of civil government. It is this influence that is the defining element necessary in creating and maintaining America’s exceptionalism, and it remained strong after more than four decades following the end of the Revolution and adoption of the Constitution and its Amendments. Tocqueville’s first-hand account also provides ample evidence of the centrality of religion and Christianity in particular in America of the early 1830s:

The Americans so completely identify the spirit of Christianity with freedom in their minds that it is almost impossible to get them to conceive the one without the other…

On my arrival in the United States, it was the religious atmosphere which first struck me. As I extended my stay, I could observe the political consequences which flowed from this novel situation. In France I had seen the spirit of religion moving in the opposite direction to that of the spirit of freedom. In America I found them intimately linked together in joint reign over the same land.

…America is still the country in the world where the Christian religion has retained the greatest real power over people’s souls and nothing shows better how useful and natural religion is to man, since the country where it exerts the greatest sway is also the most enlightened and free.

Therefore, from the words of the Founders and Tocqueville, we see the defining element that distinguishes America as the most exceptional of any nation in history. That element was not just religiosity but the influence of Christianity and its principles upon the new nation, its civil government, and citizens.

Among most of the institutions of American life and their leaders in the 21st century, the God of the Founders is no longer welcome. The Founders, if alive today, would not recognize America. Look at the seven themes Wilson and Schuck identified as important to America’s exceptionalism. Patriotism has been replaced by the “hate America first” crowd. Individualism and spirit of enterprise have been replaced by a drive toward a nanny-state government, entitlements, and invented and illusory rights. Individual rights and decentralization of government have been replaced by a “greatest good for the greatest number” mentality enforced by a monstrous bureaucracy. The American economy is losing its competitiveness due to confiscatory taxes, onerous regulatory burdens, and erosion of and loss of individual property rights as the country marches toward socialism. American culture has become a moral sewer as Christian morality is replaced by moral relativism in which there are no standards of right and wrong. Humanistic definitions of multiculturalism, tolerance, and equality are undermining the nation’s central cultural vision resulting in a loss of unity necessary for it to survive.

Those that deny American exceptionalism do so from the perspective of a humanistic worldview. Those holding that worldview have no trouble embracing various aspects contributing toward exceptionalism such as abundance of natural resources, isolation from the problems of Europe and other parts of the world, America’s cultural diversity, and the absence of class distinctions apart from the stain of long-ago slavery. However, the central, defining, and dominating presence of one element in birthing American exceptionalism is an embarrassment to them: America’s Christian religion. Therefore, American exceptionalism is judged guilty by association and like Christianity must be denied and driven from the public square. However, such denial is nothing more than historical revisionism.

Larry G. Johnson

Sources:

Peter H. Schuck and James Q. Wilson, eds., Understanding America: The Anatomy of an Exceptional Nation, (New York: Public Affairs, 2008), pp. 627-643.

Karlyn Bowman, “Understanding American Exceptionalism,” The American – The Online Magazine of the American Enterprise Institute, April 28, 2008. http://www.american.com/archive/2008/april-04-08/understanding-american-exceptionalism (accessed April 5, 2013)

Tocqueville, Alexis De, Democracy in America, Gerald E. Bevan, Trans., (London, England: Penguin Books, 2003), pp. 340, 343, 345.

American Exceptionalism – Part I – Myth or God’s Blessing?

What is this thing called “American exceptionalism” that surfaces periodically in political speeches, esoteric articles and books in the academic world, and an occasional mention on talk radio? The term “American exceptionalism” is of recent origin (less than 100 years) but the concept of the unique and exceptional nature of the United States has been recognized and accepted for more than 200 years.

The unique and exceptional nature of the United States was noted by numerous Founders during and after the American Revolution. However, widespread recognition of the unrivaled and exceptional nature of the United States in comparison to the rest of the world began with Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, a monumental study of America. The visiting Frenchman described what he saw during his nine-month journey across America in 1831. But for America and the concept of American exceptionalism, there are many detractors in the 21st century, both here and abroad, many of whom are of the “hate America” variety and which are especially found in academia.

Tocqueville’s Democracy in America has been called one of the most influential political texts ever written on America. Yet, Terrence McCoy in an article written for The Atlantic dismissively calls Tocqueville’s Democracy in America a “travelogue”. The title of McCoy’s article claims that Soviet leader “Joseph Stalin invented American exceptionalism.” McCoy states, “There’s only one problem with that (American exceptionalism): It’s not strictly true. Although a superiority complex has long pervaded the national psyche, the expression ‘American exceptionalism’ only became big a few years ago.” McCoy is referring to the first use of the term “American exceptionalism” in the 1920s. The phrase came from an English translation of a condemnation made in Stalin’s 1929 criticism of the Communist supporters of Jay Lovestone for their heretical belief that America was independent of the Marxist laws of history “thanks to its natural resources, industrial capacity, and absence of rigid class distinctions.” (Marxist laws flow from the humanistic worldview which says there is no creator, man is basically good, and man can establish his own laws devoid of any independent supernatural authority.)

It appears that McCoy believes that the non-existence of the label of “American exceptionalism” prior to the 1920s proves that the concept and reality of American exceptionalism since the nation’s inception did not exist. To agree with McCoy’s shallow analysis and conclusions with regard to the existence of and belief in American exceptionalism is only possible when one ignores Democracy in America and other considerable evidence of wide recognition and acceptance of the concept following publication of Tocqueville’s book in 1835.

The theme of American exceptionalism became common in the 19th century, especially in textbooks. From the 1840s to the late 19th century, 120 million copies of the McGuffey’s Reader textbooks were sold. Most American students studied the Readers which hailed American exceptionalism, manifest destiny, and America as God’s country even in the more secularized versions beginning in 1879.

For others who believe that America may have once been the greatest nation in the world, they now say that is no longer true. In an article by Tyler Gobin in the Technician Online, he states that America is no longer at the top of the heap. Our competiveness has fallen and Americans are perceived as lazy and culturally unaware. Mr. Gobin believes that, “…we ought to stop believing we are unique…and stop ignoring that we are only one part of a larger whole.” Gobin believes that, “Obama correctly recognized that exceptionalism stands for uniqueness and not superiority.”

Following Stalin’s use of “American exceptionalism,” the phrase fell into obscurity for half a century, until it was popularized by American newspapers in the 1980s to describe America’s cultural and political uniqueness. The phrase became an issue of contention between presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain in the 2008 presidential campaign. President Obama again landed in hot water during the 2012 campaign against Mitt Romney for saying that while he (Obama) “believed in ‘American exceptionalism,’ it was no different from ‘British exceptionalism,’ ‘Greek exceptionalism,’ or any other country’s brand of patriotic chest-thumping.” But if everyone is exceptional, then no one is exceptional…thus the denial of American exceptionalism and its denigration as mere “patriotic chest thumping.” President Obama’s position is understandable given a thing such as American exceptionalism would offend his radical egalitarian sensibilities.

With certainty, the Founders would not have agreed with President Obama. Rather, they would agree with James Madison. Speaking of the American Revolution and the crafting of the Constitution, Madison said, “It is impossible for the man of pious reflection not to perceive in it a finger of that Almighty hand which has been so frequently and signally extended to our relief in the critical stages of revolution.” Madison’s words echo the beliefs of many other Founders that America was an exceptional nation and the product of God’s providence.

We have examined the origins and spread of the concept of American exceptionalism as well as the claims of the deniers and detractors. In Part II we will search for that one element that made possible American exceptionalism and why its deniers and detractors are so adverse to any consideration of its reality in the history of the nation. In Part III we must consider the question, “Will America continue to be an exceptional nation, or will it succumb to the cycle of nations and have ‘Rest In Peace’ inscribed on its headstone?”

Larry G. Johnson

Sources:

Tocqueville, Alexis De, Democracy in America, Gerald E. Bevan, Trans., (London, England: Penguin Books, 2003).

Terrence McCoy, “How Joseph Stalin Invented “American Exceptionalism,” The Atlantic, May 15, 2012, http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/03/how-joseph-stalin-invented-american-exceptionalism/254534/ (accessed April 7, 2013).

Tyler Gobin, “American Exceptionalism,” Technician Online, April 2, 2013, http://www.technicianonline.com/opinion/columnists/article_c3994862-9b4b-11e2-9c65-0019bb30f31a.html (accessed April 7, 2013).

W. Cleon Skousen, The 5000 Year Leap, www.nccs.net: National Center for Constitutional Studies, 1981, p. iii.